NTA 8776 vs. CPSC: Why Your Helmet’s Safety Standard Matters
NTA 8776 vs. CPSC: Why Your Helmet’s Safety Standard Matters
When it comes to helmets, safety isn’t something you should compromise on. Yet, many people still wear helmets that are certified by outdated standards. This raises the critical question: Why are people still choosing CPSC-certified helmets when NTA 8776 exists?
What is the CPSC Standard?
The CPSC (Consumer Product Safety Commission) standard was introduced back in the 1980s when bicycles typically didn’t exceed 15 mph (24 km/h). CPSC helmets are designed to provide protection for pedal-powered bike riders, but with the rise of e-bikes, this standard is increasingly inadequate. The agency acknowledges that they are overdue to release new standards but are strapped by delays, bureaucracy, and lack of urgency, especially as standards like NTA 8776 are being relied upon more and more.
Many well-known brands continue to produce helmets that only meet the CPSC standard. Popular brands include:
While these helmets are great for traditional cycling, their effectiveness at protecting riders at higher speeds—like those common with electric bikes and scooters—is questionable.
For more information on CPSC standards, visit: https://www.cpsc.gov
What is NTA 8776?
In response to the limitations of CPSC, the NTA 8776 standard was developed in 2016. This newer certification is specifically designed for e-bikes, e-scooters, and other micromobility devices that can reach speeds of up to 28 mph (45 km/h).
Helmets certified to the NTA 8776 standard provide more extensive coverage, especially at the back and sides of the head, where impacts are more likely at higher speeds. NTA helmets offer extra layers of protection for riders engaging in faster activities.
Brands that manufacture helmets certified to the NTA 8776 standard include:
Why Are Manufacturers Still Producing CPSC Helmets?
The main reason why many manufacturers still produce CPSC helmets boils down to cost. Helmets certified to NTA 8776 standards require more robust materials and more extensive testing, which drives up production costs. Many helmet companies prefer to save money by continuing to produce CPSC-certified helmets despite knowing these helmets are less effective for faster rides on e-bikes and scooters.
But that’s where the problem lies: Why are people still wearing helmets certified for speeds up to 15 mph in a world where electric bikes regularly travel at speeds of 20-28 mph?
The Call to Action: Choose Safer, Smarter
There’s no reason to settle for less when there’s a superior safety standard available. As consumers, it’s time to demand more from helmet manufacturers. And manufacturers? It’s time to stop cutting corners and start prioritizing the safety of riders.
The difference is clear: CPSC helmets are outdated relics from a time when cycling was much slower. NTA 8776 is the modern standard designed to protect the growing number of people riding electric bikes at high speeds.
So, why would anyone choose a less safe alternative?
Comparison: NTA 8776 vs. CPSC
| Feature | NTA 8776 | CPSC |
| Certification Year | 2016 | 1980s |
| Speed Coverage | Up to 28 mph (45 km/h) | Up to 15 mph (24 km/h) |
| Intended Use | E-bikes, e-scooters, micro mobility | Traditional pedal bicycles |
| Impact Protection | Higher-speed impacts and rear coverage | Low-speed impacts, less rear protection |
| Cost to Manufacture | Higher due to stringent standards | Lower cost for manufacturers |
The Final Word: NTA 8776 Is the Future
With the rise of e-bikes and scooters, CPSC helmets are simply not designed for the faster, modern world we live in. NTA 8776 helmets offer the protection riders need to stay safe on today’s roads.
As riders, it’s time to hold manufacturers accountable. Choose helmets with NTA 8776 certification—your safety should be worth the extra protection. And for manufacturers still producing CPSC helmets? The message is clear: It’s time to invest and upgrade.
